Founder-led management consulting

Luna Sol

GROUP

OPERATING TRANSFORMATION

Start a conversation

Operational Excellence

Make execution reliable at scale.

Luna Sol helps leaders turn operating priorities into clear standards, accountable decisions and a performance rhythm that holds across teams and locations.

Representative photography / Unsplash

WHAT WE DO

Connect the business problem to an executable response.

A missed target is often the visible symptom of an operating system that is difficult to run. Measures disagree, reviews generate activity without closure, and frontline teams inherit competing priorities. We start with the decisions people need to make, then connect the measures, routines and ownership required to execute them.

The work can include an operating diagnostic, a redesigned review cadence, standard work or a recovery program. Each engagement defines the evidence required to move from a reported improvement to a verified change in operating performance.

Operating model & standard work

Clarify how work moves between teams, which decisions belong at each level and what must be escalated. Translate that design into practical routines and standards.

TYPICAL OUTPUTS

Decision rights, workflow standards and escalation rules

Performance management

Rebuild scorecards and reviews around a consistent metric definition, an accountable owner and a decision. Connect leading indicators to the outcomes they are intended to influence.

TYPICAL OUTPUTS

Metric dictionary, review cadence and action register

Recovery & execution assurance

Structure recovery around validated gaps, available capacity and explicit commitments. Make slippage, dependencies and completion evidence visible before a deadline is missed.

TYPICAL OUTPUTS

Recovery plan, commitment tracker and verification gates

OUR APPROACH

Diagnose precisely. Design for use. Verify what changes.

A practical sequence, adapted to the operating question and the evidence available.

01

Locate the constraint

Observe the workflow, reconcile the baseline and identify where delay, rework or unclear ownership limits performance.

02

Design the operating mechanism

Specify the decision, owner, standard, review frequency and escalation trigger. Keep the mechanism usable by the people doing the work.

03

Test in the operating environment

Trial the change at a defined scope. Track adoption, process behavior and mature outcomes against an explicit comparison.

04

Transfer ownership & sustain

Equip managers to run the cadence, verify completion and revise standards as conditions change. Establish when to intervene and when to leave a stable process alone.

EXECUTIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE

The work behind the approach.

These cases document real work Ryan Miller performed at Amazon in prior executive roles. Each report describes the operating challenge, his contribution and the evidence supporting its conclusions.

15 executive project cases

Representative photograph: Colleagues reviewing code on a computer screen.

Enterprise Data Issue Management

An anonymized project case study of a data-issues register: consolidating fragmented escalations, distinguishing related defects, exposing missing commitments and defining how a remedy should be verified.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Performance measures displayed on a computer screen.

Enterprise Operating Scorecards

An anonymized project case study of a weekly operating tracker: linking performance measures, targets, source versions and action ownership so executives can use the report to make defensible decisions.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Colleagues reviewing a clipboard on a warehouse floor.

Execution Assurance & Accountability

An anonymized project case study of a distributed service network’s action-governance redesign: how evidence standards, execution maturity and verification capacity determine whether corrective work can be trusted.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: An employee completing a clipboard check.

Execution Standards & Verification

An anonymized project case study of an execution-verification matrix: defining what proves a committed operating action occurred, exposing gaps in the available evidence and specifying the mechanism needed to close each gap.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: A team discussing priorities around a meeting table.

Executive Performance Review

An anonymized project case study of a recurring customer-defect and loss review: reconciling reported movement, distinguishing competing explanations and assigning evidence-backed action across two operating groups.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Racks of cartons in a distribution warehouse.

Network Quality Governance

An anonymized project case study of a delivery network’s quality-review mechanism: how metric definitions, action verification and source precision shape operating decisions.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Financial reports and a calculator under review.

Operating Close & Workbook Governance

An anonymized project case study of a shared operating workbook: repairing formulas, reconciling monthly inputs, preserving owner accountability and defining when the management view is ready for release.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Business leaders reviewing a document together.

Operating Commitments & Accountability

An operating-project case on repairing accountability in a distributed delivery network. It examines a commitment audit, reconciles conflicting performance interpretations, and defines an auditable path from a reported action to a mature customer outcome.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Colleagues reviewing a spreadsheet on a laptop.

Performance Reporting & Action Alignment

An anonymized project case study of executive performance reporting: rebuilding a business-line response around one recovery gap, explicit action coverage, accountable owners and evidence that can support a decision.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: A warehouse employee operating material-handling equipment.

Recovery Execution & Deadline Readiness

An operating-project case on a pre-peak loss-reduction plan that tested its own sizing, success metrics and delivery dependencies. It connects overlapping defect populations, executable controls and the evidence required to commit a deadline-bound result.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Trucks traveling along a highway.

Recovery Forecast & Delivery Commitments

An operating-project case on answering an executive return-to-plan question. It reconciles competing plan rows, conflicting reporting series, recovery arithmetic and action dependencies, then designs a test of the forecast-to-commitment workflow.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: A pen beside a printed line-chart report.

Recovery Forecasting & Benefit Attribution

An anonymized project case study of a service-network reforecast: reconciling intervention bookings, isolating model revisions and defining the evidence required to turn an operating commitment into defensible performance credit.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: Colleagues arranging notes on a planning board.

Recovery Planning & Commitment Assurance

An anonymized project case study of a service-network recovery plan: reconciling competing targets, testing station-level feasibility and connecting executive commitments to accountable operating actions.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: A team discussing priorities around a table.

Recovery Roadmap & Outcome Alignment

An executive recovery-plan case that separates line specificity, calendar feasibility, input-response evidence and approval. It tests when a quantified roadmap supports a commitment.

Read the case study

Representative photograph: A hand pointing to a roadmap on a whiteboard.

Standard Work & Escalation Design

An operating-project case on connecting defect categories to governing procedures, practical actions and accountable owners. It examines a policy-coverage diagnostic, corrects its causal interpretation and designs a controlled test of evidence-based routing.

Read the case study

START WITH THE DECISION

Where does execution break down, and what mechanism will prevent the same failure from returning?

START WITH THE OPERATING DECISION

Bring the decision, the evidence available, and the consequence of getting it wrong.

We will tell you where the evidence is strong, where it is only directional, and what must be tested before action.

START WITH THE OPERATING DECISION

Bring the decision, the evidence available, and the consequence of getting it wrong.

We will tell you where the evidence is strong, where it is only directional, and what must be tested before action.

Luna Sol

GROUP

Founder-led management consulting for consequential operating decisions in logistics, mobility, retail, and investor-backed businesses.

© 2026 Luna Sol Group LLC

© 2026 Luna Sol Group LLC

All client and company marks belong to their respective owners.

Luna Sol

GROUP

Founder-led management consulting for consequential operating decisions in logistics, mobility, retail, and investor-backed businesses.

© 2026 Luna Sol Group LLC

© 2026 Luna Sol Group LLC

All client and company marks belong to their respective owners.